- #Native instruments komplete 7 in box update#
- #Native instruments komplete 7 in box full#
- #Native instruments komplete 7 in box software#
- #Native instruments komplete 7 in box license#
No regard for the customers situation, at all. Maybe this whole thing was really well thought out and they soon arrived at the conclusion that holding ‘prisoners’ is where the real money and the safe bet are. Maybe that’s where the “incredible success” comes from. Hey maybe the model is incredibly successful because artists have decades long worth of projects already done in Adobe applications that may need re-work at any time and they’re now hostage to the company the minute they decide to value their precious time and work. “Otherwise, Adobe’s model wouldn’t be incredibly successful” No, I never paid for any Adobe application, the thing was… I was getting ready to, but they didn’t give me a chance and started out with this model then.Īnd then there’s also that phenomenon of people staying in the wrong side of the issue in an attempt to justify to themselves their own big perpetual investment – perhaps, that would be you. My beef is forcing us to spend way da fuk much more money in the long run. As you can see from my original post “if subscription is optional, fine”. Yes, that phenomenon exists but I’m not part of it. Maybe they don’t like that new users can get the software, without spending the type of money you had to 10 years ago.”
#Native instruments komplete 7 in box software#
“Maybe they were heavily invested in software ownership. They have removed barriers for non rich people, and cause of that all of a sudden nothing outside of the subscription model is even conceivable?! Try harder.
#Native instruments komplete 7 in box license#
IMan… If they are as successful as you claim they are, then they can sure have a perpetual license as an option. Native Instruments is going to have to do a lot more to be able to duplicate Adobe’s model, but they’re obviously taking a step in that direction. Otherwise, Adobe’s model wouldn’t be incredibly successful and other companies would not be trying so hard to duplicate their success. Maybe they don’t like that new users can get the software, without spending the type of money you had to 10 years ago.
Maybe they were heavily invested in software ownership. There are obviously some people, like you, that hate subscription models. So Adobe customers and investors have benefited tremendously. The subscription model removed that barrier to entry and makes it possible for just about anybody to use their software. People could only use it if they were rich or if they had it at work. The entry level pricing for Adobe’s Creative Suite was $1300 back then. Adobe is literally worth 20 times what it was worth 10 years ago, before Creative Cloud was introduced. My beef with Cherry Audio is they move too fast for me to keep up with them, so I stopped trying. Cherry Audio is the rising star in the industry. Cherry Audio – They have put out at least a dozen new instruments since NI released Massive X.
They are better at putting stuff out and updating it than Native Instruments and even Korg.
#Native instruments komplete 7 in box full#
Full Bucket – they are going to get my next money even though they release their stuff as shareware. Roland? Their constantly changing software plan confuses me, and I don’t need anything they sell enough to keep up with their changes. They are pretty slow at coming up with new things.
#Native instruments komplete 7 in box update#
Korg updates are slow, but when they do update they do a good job. I havent had reason to pay them any money since 2017. Their User interfaces remain mired in 2003. In contrast, Native Instruuments barely updates its stuff.
Arturia usually finds a way to get about $150/year from me in updates and new instruments – but they are good about updating their plugins, and they come out with 1-2 brand new instruments a year that are really good and another 1-2 that arn’t my cup of tea.
0 kommentar(er)
